In the last post, I described the sequence of events from the beginning of the larger Universe that lead to the very first introduction of essential elements into expression in the Space super-state. Though the process took millions (if not billions) of years, the elements making up Space at that point consisted of only 16 (24) unique essence distributions, of very different frequencies. However, all of those elements (in this very first expression in Space) had exactly the same size because of their equal essence amounts in the Space states (S2 = .00243, S1 = 0). A density map of the initial Universe, would then look like:
The initial Space-based expression of the Universe. All expressed elements of the same size/density – but of 16 distinct distributions.
Of the 16 distinct distributions in the nascent Universe, 8 (comprising about 88% of the total) would be of the general form [.2401,?,?,?,?,.00243,0]. The other 8 distributions (comprising about 12% of the total) would be of the form [.16807,?,?,?,?,.00243,0] and, because of their lower S7 amount, would be the first ones to experience another cascade event. But, that next cascade event would likely still be hundreds of millions of years after the one that preceded it. (This is the time scale of much of the cascading of essence that goes on in the Universe.)
What happens to the initial Universe during this time?
As I said earlier, during this period all the elements in the Universe are of exactly the same size/density – but they are of 16 different overall distributions. Cohesion, the force that attracts each element to every other element, as expressed in Space, has the following formula:
where a and b are any two elements, aSi is the amount of element a‘s essence in state i, and R is the distance between the centers of the a and b. So, if two elements have identical distributions, their cohesive attraction would be extremely high – likely more than high enough to start creating movement of elements, resulting in concentrations of elements of like (or near-like) distribution. While I don’t think all elements of each unique distribution would gather in a single location, I do think that there’d be a relatively or completely stable patchwork of distribution concentrations before that next cascade event.
So, those essential elements of the form [.16807,?,?,?,?,.00243,0] would be concentrated into either areas containing mostly one of the 8 such distributions, or perhaps a couple of the closer distributions in this set. When the next cascade events occurs, those [.16807,?,?,?,?,.00243,0] elements would each either experience (or not experience) a cascade from S2 to S1. The majority would not experience a cascade between S2 and S2, but those that did would then be in one of two following distribution classes:
- [.16807,?,?,?,?,?,.000729]
- [.117649,?,?,?,?,?,.000729]
While this relatively small amount of elements would have identical amounts in S1, they would now have a few different amounts in S2. The overall result would be that at that point not every element expressed in Space would still have the same size/density – some, through having non-zero S1 amounts, would be smaller than their manyfold neighbours. These new classes of elements (by their distribution) would further concentrate within their former [.16807,?,?,?,?,.00243,0] concentrations, creating denser objects in the new Universe.
Since there would still be the same number of essential elements expressed in Space, some of them with more dense distributions, the size of the entire Universe would have shrunken by a small amount as well.
Let’s use the colour blue to denote different densities in our 2D density map, with darker shades for denser regions. After the next set of re-concentrations through cohesion, our simplified Universe might look like the following.
The Space-based expression of the Universe sometime after after the second cascade event introducing essence into S1 and S2 (but before the third such event). Most elements remain of the same size/density, but some start to get smaller and collect together.
If it’s hard to see the small blue dots on the map above, click on the image to enlarge it. If you were floating around in the Universe at that time, it would be hard to observe any difference in what you were seeing, too – the variations in density would still all still appear like “empty space” to us and our measurement tools.
In the next post, I’ll describe how the subsequent cascade events start coming more frequently but irregularly and how they introduce ever-increasing complexity into the make-up of the Universe.
Filed under: Predictions and Tests, The Model Tagged: cascade events, cascades, cohesion, density, distribution, size, Space
